Underwriting · Article
How to analyze a multifamily deal in Kansas
Analyzing a Kansas multifamily deal starts with recasting the T-12 to market expenses, not the seller's actuals. We target 7.5-8.5% cap in Wichita B/C class and walk when the gap exceeds 15%.

Key takeaways
What this article covers
- Start with the T-12, then recast every expense line to market: taxes, insurance, management, maintenance, and CapEx.
- Wichita B/C class multifamily trades at 7.5-8.5% cap rates in 2026 for 5-to-50-unit properties.
- Property taxes reset on sale in Kansas; the seller's frozen tax bill is never the right number for underwriting.
- If the gap between your offer and the seller's ask exceeds 15%, walk early and explain the math clearly.
- We pass on more deals than we close; declining quickly is a service, not a failure.
I get this question from investors almost every month: "How do you actually analyze a Kansas multifamily deal before you make an offer?" The mechanics are not complicated, but most investors get tripped up on the same three or four inputs every time.
This is a walkthrough of how we approach it. The numbers in the worked example below are illustrative, not from a specific transaction. The method is real.
This is not investment or tax advice. Run your own numbers and consult your CPA and attorney before closing on any property.
Step 1: Get the T-12 before you do anything else
The trailing 12-month income and expense statement (the T-12) is the foundation of every Kansas multifamily underwrite. Ask for it on the first call. If the seller or their representative cannot produce one within a day or two, that is itself a data point worth noting.
What the T-12 should show you:
- Gross potential rent (GPR). Every unit at full occupancy, at current scheduled rents. This is the ceiling.
- Actual collected rents. What the property deposited over the past 12 months. The gap between GPR and collected is your real vacancy rate, regardless of the percentage the seller quotes verbally.
- Itemized expenses. Property taxes, insurance, utilities, management fees, maintenance and repairs, landscaping, trash, pest control. Every line matters.
The critical thing to understand about a T-12 is that it shows what the current owner paid, under the current owner's cost structure and management approach. It does not tell you what you will pay.
Which expense lines need recasting?
All of them, but four drive the most significant changes.
Property taxes. This is where Kansas investors get hurt most often. Kansas counties reassess on sale. If the seller has owned the building for 15 to 20 years, their current tax bill may reflect an assessed value set in 2008 or 2010. Your first-year tax bill will be calculated on or near the sale price. In Sedgwick County, that can mean property taxes jumping 30% to 60% in year one relative to what the T-12 shows. We always run our own post-sale tax estimate using the Sedgwick County Appraiser's tools before we finalize a price on any Wichita deal.
Insurance. Get your own quote. The seller's renewing policy reflects their claims history, their deductibles, and their carrier relationship. Those do not transfer to you. At current market rates in Wichita, a 16-unit 1974 vintage building can run $18,000 to $26,000 per year in property insurance depending on the structure, roof age, and heating system. Many T-12s for similar properties show $9,000 to $12,000. That gap materially affects your underwriting.
Property management. If you plan to own this as an investment, underwrite a third-party management fee even if you intend to self-manage at first. Plans change. The market rate in Wichita is 8% to 10% of gross collected rents. Many sellers self-manage and show zero management expense in the T-12. That is not a cost savings you're inheriting; it is an expense you are not seeing.
Capital expenditure reserves. This is the line most sellers omit entirely and most buyers underestimate. For 1970s vintage buildings in Kansas, we use $100 to $150 per door per year as a minimum CapEx reserve. On a 16-unit, that is $1,600 to $2,400 per year before a single item needs replacing. Buildings of that age have water heaters cycling out, parking lots cracking, and electrical panels that inspectors flag for service capacity.
How do you pick the right cap rate?
A lot of underwriting falls apart here. Investors either apply a national cap rate benchmark they read in an article, or they work backward from a price target rather than grounding the cap rate in actual local sales data.
For B/C class, post-1960s vintage multifamily in Wichita, KS, we currently use 7.5% to 8.5% as our target cap range on a recast NOI. Submarkets differ in meaningful ways:
- College Hill and Riverside. Demand runs consistently stronger than the city average. Vacancy is lower and tenant turnover less frequent. We see trades in the 7.0% to 7.5% range in these pockets when the deal package is clean.
- East Wichita and Northeast. More variation block-to-block. We underwrite at 8.0% to 8.5% and want strong recent comparables before going tighter than that.
- North Wichita near Midtown. Variable conditions by street. We default to 8.5% to 9.0% here unless the property has recent stabilization data we can verify directly.
These ranges reflect deals we have reviewed and underwritten in 2025 and 2026. They are not a ceiling or a floor for any individual transaction; they are the range where we find prices that pencil at current debt costs and Wichita rent levels.
The 30-minute underwriting walkthrough covers how we move from initial call to preliminary offer range on a clean deal package.
The math: from T-12 to offer price
Here is a representative example. The numbers are illustrative, not from a specific transaction. The mechanics are real.
The property:
- 16 units, 1974 vintage, Wichita East Side
- Gross potential rent: $16,800/month ($1,050 per unit average)
- Seller's stated vacancy: 5%
- Seller's stated annual expenses: $68,000
After our recast:
| Line Item | Seller's T-12 | Our Recast |
|---|---|---|
| Property taxes | $7,800 | $13,400 (post-sale estimate) |
| Insurance | $10,200 | $21,600 (broker quote) |
| Property management (0% stated, 9% recast) | $0 | $17,690 |
| Maintenance and repairs | $11,000 | $17,500 |
| CapEx reserve | $0 | $19,200 |
| Other (utilities, landscaping, trash) | $39,000 | $39,000 |
| Total annual expenses | $68,000 | $128,390 |
Using the seller's numbers:
- Gross income: $16,800 x 12 x 0.95 = $191,520
- Less expenses: $68,000
- NOI: $123,520
- At 8.0% cap: implied value of $1,544,000
Using our recast:
- Gross income: $16,800 x 12 x 0.91 = $183,456
- Less recast expenses: $128,390
- NOI: $55,066
- At 8.0% cap: implied value of $688,325
That is a gap of roughly $856,000 between the seller's implied value and the recast value. It is not a negotiating tactic. It reflects what the building produces at market expenses and a market cap rate.
We underwrote a 14-unit Wichita property in 2025 with a comparable expense profile and came in roughly $290,000 below the seller's ask after recasting property taxes (frozen for 11 years) and adding a management fee the self-managing owner had excluded entirely from the T-12. The recast was not disputed once we showed the line-by-line. The seller needed time to think about the gap.
What happens when the gap is too large?
We move on, and we do it quickly.
When the recast NOI at a market-supported cap rate produces a price that is more than 15% below the seller's ask, there is rarely a deal to be had without a meaningful change in structure or circumstances. Spending weeks negotiating toward a number our underwriting cannot support is a waste of time for both sides.
What we do instead: be direct about the math. "Here is what the expenses recast to. Here is the cap rate we need to use. Here is the price we land at. Here is the gap. If your situation changes, or if you are open to exploring a different structure, call us." That is the whole conversation.
We passed on a 12-unit Wichita property in 2026 asking $1.1 million. After recasting taxes and insurance, our recast NOI at an 8.0% cap produced an offer price around $870,000. The seller was not ready at that number at that time. We parted clearly and on good terms. The property came back to us four months later when circumstances shifted.
When does the analysis get more complicated?
Three situations require more work before you can commit to a number.
Deferred maintenance. If the roof has two or three years left, the plumbing is original galvanized iron, or you are looking at a partial electrical panel upgrade, model the cost and timing as a separate item before you price the deal. We add a one-time capital deduction to the offer for identified deferred maintenance, separate from the ongoing reserve. Pulling the permit history via the Sedgwick County Appraiser records before the walkthrough often surfaces prior repair work and outstanding issues.
Below-market rents. If current tenants are paying $850 per unit when market is $1,050, there is real upside in the building. But you cannot underwrite the upside as if it is already in place. We underwrite to in-place rents and value the mark-to-market potential separately. When the deal pencils at existing rents, the upside is a genuine bonus. When the mark-to-market upside is the only path to making the numbers work, you are likely buying someone else's problem tenants and a rent roll that will not move as cleanly as projected.
Seller financing. If the seller is willing to carry the note, the cap rate math does not go away, but the structure can sometimes bridge part of the gap between where the seller wants to price and where the recast says the building should be. We have used seller financing on Kansas deals where the price and the terms together produced a transaction that worked for both sides. The seller financing pillar page explains how owner-carry structures work in a multifamily context, including what a note, deed of trust, and assignment of rents package contains.
Is a joint venture the right structure for your Kansas deal?
If you are an investor looking at Kansas multifamily and considering bringing in an equity partner rather than operating solo, the structure matters as much as the underwriting. A joint venture or equity partnership changes who carries the operating risk, how capital is deployed, and how profits split at exit.
The real estate equity partner post walks through how equity deals are typically structured in the Wichita market. The what is a 60/40 equity deal post covers how profit splits and preferred returns actually work in a JV agreement, with line-by-line math.
How does Kallpa approach Kansas deals?
We buy 5-to-50-unit multifamily in Kansas, with Wichita as our primary market. We underwrite every deal the same way: T-12 first, full recast second, cap rate selection grounded in recent Wichita comps third, then a preliminary offer.
We have reviewed properties across Wichita's submarkets and have a clear picture of where rents, vacancy, and operating expenses actually land in 2026. We make our own decisions and sign the LOI ourselves. When the numbers work, we move fast.
If you are looking at a Kansas multifamily deal and want a second set of eyes on the underwriting, reach out directly. On a clean deal package with a T-12 and rent roll, we can usually get back to you with a preliminary view within one business day.
For sellers trying to understand what a buyer like us actually evaluates when we look at a property, the Kansas market page covers our acquisition criteria and the kinds of deals we are actively pursuing.
Frequently asked
Frequently asked questions
-
What cap rate should I use for Wichita multifamily in 2026?
For B/C class, post-1960s vintage properties in Wichita, we target 7.5% to 8.5% cap on a recast NOI. College Hill and Riverside trade tighter, often 7.0-7.5%. Properties with deferred maintenance or elevated vacancy may require 9% or above to compensate for near-term capital needs. Base your selection on actual sales comps in the specific submarket, not national benchmarks. -
How do I recast operating expenses for a Kansas multifamily property?
Get your own quotes for property tax (estimate post-sale assessed value via the Sedgwick County Appraiser site), insurance (a fresh broker quote, not the seller's renewing policy), and property management (8-10% of gross collected rents). Add $60-80 per door per month for maintenance and $100-150 per door per year for CapEx reserve on 1970s vintage buildings. The gap between seller's stated expenses and a full recast is typically $200-600 per door annually. -
What is the biggest mistake new investors make when analyzing Kansas multifamily?
Using the seller's current property tax bill instead of the post-sale assessed value. Kansas counties reassess on sale. If the seller has owned the building for 20 years with a frozen assessment, the new owner's tax burden can jump 30-60% from day one. This single line item causes more deal mispricing than any other expense in our underwriting experience. -
How do you decide when to walk from a Kansas multifamily deal?
When the recast NOI at a market-supported cap rate produces a price more than 15% below the seller's ask, there is usually no deal without a change in structure or circumstances. We explain the math clearly, leave the door open for when situations change, and move on. We never bid a number we cannot defend in our own underwriting. -
Does Kallpa use a standard underwriting template for Kansas deals?
We use the same spreadsheet for every market in our footprint: Washington, Texas, and Kansas. Inputs change by market (tax rates, insurance costs, rent benchmarks, cap rates) but the structure is constant. Revenue, then vacancy, then six expense categories, then NOI, then value. On a clean deal package we can reach a preliminary offer range in 30 minutes.
Sources
References cited
Keep reading
More on underwriting
-

Article Underwriting
BRRRR investing partner in Washington state
A Washington state BRRRR equity partnership pairs an active operator with a capital partner. Kallpa sources and runs the deal; the partner contributes capital and earns a preferred return plus a profit split at refinance.
-

Article Underwriting
What is a 60/40 equity deal in real estate?
In a 60/40 equity JV deal, a capital partner owns 60% and the operating partner owns 40% of a property. Returns and tax benefits split by that ratio. Kallpa structures these as direct two-party JVs, not pooled syndications.
-

Article Underwriting
Selling a Wichita duplex to a cash buyer
Cash buyers price Wichita duplexes using income, not Zillow estimates. At $1,050 per door per month (illustrative), income-approach value lands near $140,000-$170,000 depending on condition, expenses, and the cap rate applied.
Direct line
Got a property, a question, or both?
Jose answers his own line and reads his own inbox. No analyst, no acquisitions associate.



